Potter Williams Report

Guilty! Kermit, Barack and Michelle! All 3!

M. Catharine Evans — Tue, 14 May 2013 16:44:59 GMT

Obama did his part to keep baby killer Kermit Gosnell in business. He orchestrated the defeat of the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act while in the state senate. See video below.

If that's not bad enough for a sitting President, his wife went even farther. In a 2004 Fund Raising Letter, the First Lady railed against Conservatives for their opposition to partial birth abortion.

Read it and weep for our country and our children. [Hat tip: Jill Stanek]

Purging Obama Style: Crisis as Opportunity

M. Catharine Evans — Mon, 13 May 2013 15:13:18 GMT

Obama sees crises as opportunities to purge the old guard and replace them with those of a Marxist mentality. As soon as one crisis ends, another takes its place: think Benghazi, Newtown, Boston. But simultaneously, to distract the people from this emotional roller coaster, and to have an excuse to replace non-conformists, throw in scandals like the IRS targeting conservatives, and the military expelling top generals over sex scandals.

This isn’t just Obama style, it’s Soviet style.

What prompted the IRS, the most feared and powerful government agency in US history, to apologize to Tea Party type groups last Friday? Conservatives have been sounding the warning bell about increased scrutiny by Obama's IRS toward patriotic organizations since 2011, so why now?

Why has the press been given the green light on the IRS apology story after Obama's latest remarks to students in Ohio? Why did Mrs. Obama, a week after her husband warned the students not to listen to tea party types, go against his advice and tell an Eastern Kentucky University graduating class to open their hearts and minds to those who may think differently?

So much happening in this Marxist administration and so many questions: it’s all in the plan.

As others have pointed out the IRS doesn't offer an apology very often--the last one was to singer Dionne Warwick in 2012 and before that was September 1997 for targeting entertainers and four unnamed citizens (hat tip: srdem65 white house dossier).

Could it be a deflection from the Benghazi hearings and whistleblower testimony which took place days before? How about another scandal-related purge to get rid of a Bush holdover, Lois Lerner, the Director who oversees Tax Exempt organizations for the IRS? With Obamcare set to go into effect in 2014 the Obama administration may have engaged in a little spring cleaning.

In 2012 Michael Sullivan, the Director of the Secret Service since 2005, stepped down after an embarrassing incident involving revelations that 11 agents hired prostitutes while on assignment at the Summit of the Americas in Columbia.

Before that Obama fired General Stanley McChrystal after the left-leaning Rolling Stones quoted the Afghanistan war commander belittling members of the civilian counterpart strategy team. Mr. Obama stated, "I welcome debate, but I won't tolerate division."

Obama replaced McChrystal in 2010 with a man Moveon.org dubbed General 'Betray-Us' in a full page newspaper ad in 2007 for his skewing of facts coming out of Iraq. David Petraeus later was named head of the CIA only to resign in shame after a sex scandal.

Now Lisa Lerner is about to be thrown overboard after heading up her division at the IRS since 2001. How else to explain the timing of the IRS' mea culpa? Of course, the Obama administration likes to kill as many birds as possible with one huge rock so Friday's news that the White House will investigate the IRS could also serve as a deflection from the whistleblower testimony on Benghazi just days before.

Apparently, Obama went to bed the night of the known terrorist attack to rest up for his Las Vegas fundraiser while Hillary Clinton's State Department told a special ops detail to stand down. I'm just a lowly civilian, but that's what I heard from three brave men who testified last Tuesday.

Another more ominous explanation for the sudden apology and Jay Carney's metamorphosis from Obama's snide, arrogant, elitist press secretary to a citizen concerned about our most sacrosanct freedom, the freedom of speech, involves thinking like a Marxist.

Is something coming down the pike that might center on the Tea Party? We've had to deal with the horrors of Benghazi, Newtown and the Boston bombing all in rapid succession so it's only human we are all asking 'what's next?'

Obama is no friend to those who want limited government and a strict adherence to free market principles. On May 6 he told Ohio State University graduates to reject those voices that talk about government tyranny--a week later the mainstream media, from network news, to his most loyal shills at MSNBC, can't get the story of IRS shenanigans out fast enough.

The Party leaders running this country might be taking a page out of Soviet history.

In 1920 Lenin understood what a precarious position he and his revolutionaries were in trying to control the masses. After the 1917 coup, he even told one of his comrades that being in the height of power, after working underground for so long, made "his head spin."

In 1920, three years after the Revolution, peasant revolts and rebellions started popping up everywhere. One of their slogans was "soviets without Communists." In order to ward off the people's frustrations and downright hostility to communism the Party came up with a special kind of proletarian democracy using the slogan "enlivening the soviets." It was designed to relax some of the iron-fisted policies needed to secure power.

The Congress of Soviets in a resolution of 1925 declared that the major weakness of the soviets consisted in a lack of contact with the masses.

...[one of Stalin's top administrators] was not altogether clear about how the two objectives of winning greater popular support and maintaining Party control were to be simultaneously attained, he appeared to have believed that they might be achieved by diminishing the appearance of command without reducing its substance.

In these and other top level discussions of the problem, it is quite clear that the Party had no intention of giving up its preeminent position and permitting the growth of a "loyal opposition." Instead it wanted to widen the base of a\mass support in so doing drive out of strategic positions any groups or individuals who opposed its policies. [Barrington Moore, Jr. Soviet Politics-The Dilemma of Power (New York: Harper and Row1950, p 131-132)]

One year later the Communist Party's strategy became clear. In 1926 a declaration of the Party Committee proclaimed that the goal of "enlivening the soviets" was directed toward "the final destruction of the remnants of the influence of bourgeois elements upon the toiling masses."

The IRS apology should have all patriots on their toes. Marxists are like batterers, master manipulators--after they attack their victim, they apologize. The constant back and forth affords them ever increasing control. But unlike batterers, the gang at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue thinks long-term.

2014 will be a crucial year for the Obama administration. When Obamacare goes into full effect under the same low-level hands responsible for targeting tea party groups the potential for mass demonstrations and revolts is high. What better way to quell the dissent than a pre-emptive extension of the olive branch?

Michelle O. Can’t Stop Using Children, Now It’s Gun Control

M. Catharine Evans — Mon, 06 May 2013 16:08:13 GMT

Michelle Obama told a CBS reporter this past weekend Chicago school kids, who live five blocks from the Obama's 1.6 million ill-gotten family home in Hyde Park, think about death morning, noon and night.

Apparently the First Lady noticed the fear in the tikes' eyes after she gave a speech last month on gun violence.

“I mean, every single kid worries about their own death, or the death of someone, every single day,” Obama said.

We have millions of kids living in these kinds of circumstances who are doing everything right...And we, as a nation, have to embrace these kids and let them know that we hear them, and see them. One kid told me he felt like he lived in a cage, because he feels like his community is unseen, unheard and nobody cares about it.

It's demonic how Michelle can't stop using children.

The truth is Mrs. Obama wants guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens not because of the children but because increasing numbers of Americans are not especially fond of her husband's socialist policies.

Not surprisingly, her interview on CBS Sunday Morning just happened to coincide with Mr. Obama's speech in Mexico where he blamed the United States gun culture for that country's drug wars.

Another truth: Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, so why don't the kids feel safe? According to the administration stricter gun control will mean we can change those gun-free zones at schools to worry-free utopias for the little ones. Funny, that's not how it turned out in Newtown or Chicago. But hard evidence and logic don't get leftists where they want to go.

Word to Michelle: It's you and your millionaire racist pals who helped create the culture of death. Now you want to pick the bones clean of the smallest and most innocent victims of your atheistic policies by using them to further erode our Second Amendment rights.

All this while your kids and the kids of your comrades get armed guard protection at their high-falutin school?

Your Mom-in-Chief mask, bangs and all, can't hide this monstrous strategy.

Obama, Holder Throw Blacks to Wayside; On to Illegals

M. Catharine Evans — Wed, 01 May 2013 02:06:00 GMT

Raynard Jackson, a "moderate Republican" consultant based in DC, recently condemned black leadership for selling out their people in the name of immigration reform.

Jackson posted his opinion piece a day after Attorney General Eric Holder addressed the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF).

From Atlanta Daily World:

Once again the Black community has been shown how irrelevant they have become in the U.S. Most of the blame can be laid at the feet of the media appointed Black leadership for selling out their people. And we’ve gotten nothing in return.

Iscariot had sense enough to get 30 pieces of silver when he sold out Jesus Christ.

Isn’t it amazing that with all the debate swirling around the issue of amnesty for the illegals in the U.S., no one on either side of the debate has engaged with the Black community? Blacks will be hurt the most by giving amnesty to these 11 million illegals and yet there has not been one town hall meeting with the Black community to discuss how this issue will negatively impact the Black community’s high unemployment rate.

The official Black unemployment rate was 13.3 percent in March, approximately double the White rate of 6.7 percent. If the White community had the same unemployment number as Blacks, it would be declared a national emergency and Congress would be having hearings all over the country to solve this problem.

Jackson's April 25 article mysteriously omits any mention of Attorney General Eric Holder or Obama. Instead he, like so many of these new black faux Republicans, feigns outrage towards old stalwarts like Ben Jealous and Al Sharpton while treating the real traitors in the Obama cabinet and Obama himself with kid gloves. Sorry, not buying Jackson's frustration. If this next statement is any indication he's just a race-baiter himself.

Where was the illegal Hispanic community on Trayvon Martin? Where was the homosexual community on apartheid in South Africa or the genocide in Rwanda? Where are the White women on repealing the “wet foot, dry foot policy” in Miami?

What Jackson doesn't get is Marxists like Holder and Obama don't give a whit about blacks or their civil rights unless there's an upcoming election or taxpayer monies involved.

Holder's April 24 speech to the far-left MALDEF should prove once and for all that minority groups are a dime a dozen to the Marxist-in-Chief and his inner circle.

MALDEF was set up in 1968 by the Ford Foundation, a non-profit closely associated with advancing the socialist/Marxist/progressive vision of a world without borders.

In 2010, a week before the midterms, MALDEF attorneys went all out in Arizona seeking a court order in support of people who cast provisional ballots but who had not shown up to offer any proof of citizenship.

Leftist outfits like MALDEF will throw anything against the wall to see if it sticks. Pushing "civil rights" for tens of millions of illegals and poor Latinos to get them on the voting rolls became the new strategy in 2010.

Blacks and their problems were yesterday's news. Holder and cohorts have moved on to Hispanics now. Here's what the highest law enforcement official in the United States thinks about out-of-work blacks:

From his MALDEF address, April 24, 2013:

Creating a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million unauthorized immigrants in this country is essential. The way we treat our friends and neighbors who are undocumented – by creating a mechanism for them to earn citizenship and move out of the shadows – transcends the issue of immigration status. This is a matter of civil and human rights. It is about who we are as a nation. And it goes to the core of our treasured American principle of equal opportunity.

Obama won 93% of the black vote in 2008 and almost 90% in 2012. But their job is done. No need to pander anymore.

The way he and Holder see it, African-Americans, like young white millenials drank the Kool-Aid and got hooked. Now it's on to the next group of desperate suckers.

My bet is Raynard Jackson voted for Obama in 2008, so to go around complaining about the administration's disregard for the black community's unemployment rate and dissing Obama's new BFFs--11 million illegal immigrants--is amusing.

If rank and file blacks like Jackson didn't do their homework on Obama’s close associations with communist tied organizations like MALDEF then it’s nobody’s fault but their own.

MALDEF’s now deceased co-founder Mario Obledo was close friends with Obama’s buddy, former Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. Villaraigosa has his own communist friends in Evelina Alarcon, the sister of state Senator Richard Alarcon. Evelina is Vice Chair of CPUSA and Chair of the Southern California Communist Party. She also writes for Peoples Weekly World, a communist newspaper.

Why is this important?

Because Marxism is the endgame; not making life better for unemployed blacks.

MALDEF’s Obledo vowed in 1998 that Hispanics “would take over all the political institutions of California…California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn’t like it should leave…if Anglos don’t like Mexicans they ought to leave. They ought to go back to Europe.”

Holder stands with the Marxist leaning MALDEF because that’s where his allegiance lies. He won’t lose any sleep over illegal immigrants draining the system and taking jobs away from poor blacks.

Raynard Jackson might be playing some kind of dumb and dumber game here but he should know after 5 years, Obama, Jarrett, Mrs. Obama and the Attorney General couldn’t care less about the blacks that voted them into office. It’s not about their civil rights—it’s about Mexicans. Holder said so in his MALDEF speech.

Obama Parrots Alinsky in Marxist Address after Boston Bombing

M. Catharine Evans — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:59:52 GMT

Following the terrorist attack carried out by two Islamic extremists at the Boston Marathon last week, Obama juxtaposed the terms “common creed” and “superficial differences.”

“Democracy in the diabolical sense,” wrote C.S. Lewis, “(I am as good as you, Being like Folks, Togetherness) is the finest instrument we could possibly have for extirpating political Democracies from the face of the earth.” (Lewis, Screwtape Letters)

Lewis described this demonic democracy as a “democratic spirit” which would create a nation full of undisciplined, semiliterate and arrogant fools who are led to believe the future of the nation embodied in the collective is more important than the individual soul.

No one promulgates this delusional mindset more than Obama and his Marxist colleagues.

In last Saturday’s post-Boston bombing radio address Obama invoked America’s “common creed” as effectively cutting across whatever “superficial differences we may have.” This is what “makes our country strong,” the President said.

For those not paying attention or not fluent in Marxist-ese Obama’s statement comes across as “we’re all in the same boat together, all bound by the same human emotions and desires.” But that’s not what he said.

In the context of his background as an organizer who taught Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals at the Industrial Areas Foundation, and whose Chicago BFF’s are Rashid Khalidi, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn—all of whom babysat his children—we need to question Obama’s definition of “common creed” and what in his book constitutes “superficial differences.”

We find a partial answer in his inaugural address this past January. After declaring that our nation will fight for democracy from Asia to the Middle East, not out of “mere charity,” he says, (that’s too American I guess) but in order to “advance” the principles of our “common creed," Obama clarifies what he means by “common creed.”

We will support democracy from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to the Middle East, because our interests and our conscience compel us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom. And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice –- not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity, human dignity and justice.

We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths –- that all of us are created equal –- is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth. (Applause.)

Blasphemy comes naturally to Obama.

“A King” proclaimed that individual freedom is linked to the collective. Aside from depicting MLK, Jr. as a Christ figure, that’s a mighty demonic assertion in itself. How can I truly exercise my God-given free will when “inextricably bound” to every other person on earth? Doesn’t that negate the whole notion of freedom?

Alinsky, like Obama, also employed “We the people” to promote the idea of a collective free will. The Chicago radical suggested that the basis of democracy could be summed up in “We the people will work out our own destiny.”

Of course it would be his People’s Organization built on Marxist ideals that would define that destiny.

“We the People” for Alinsky and his future student Barack Obama was the perfect catch-all, bequeathed by the founding fathers themselves no less, to release this “democratic spirit” of oneness over the masses.

From Alinsky’s Reveille for Radicals:

A People’s Organization smashes all artificial barriers, sectarian interests, religious, nationality, and racial distinctions.

A few pages later Alinsky gets down to business. He maintains organized religion, organized business, organized labor unions that emphasize money rather than social action and all other organized institutions representing the status quo must go. “We the people” must be joined together sans barriers in one huge blob-like form. People are so much easier to control that way.

Obama parrots Alinsky’s call to unite “through a common interest which far transcends individual differences.”

Obama and Alinsky would have us believe our differences are superficial and all of our interests are the same. That our beliefs are all identical. That those who worship Allah are the same as those who believe in the Resurrection. That atheists, abortion rights activists, and pro-life Christians by the virtue that they are all human really have a lot in common. That the nuclear family of mom, dad and kids is the same as Janie having two mommies or daddies.

For them, democracy means we are all great people and the only thing standing in our way of peaceful co-existence are our different beliefs imposed on us by the rule of law and centuries of institutional indoctrination.

In the progressive world this makes sense. There is no sin, no evil, no right and wrong, no Creator. This is Obama’s common creed and it couldn’t be more different from the Judeo-Christian principles upon which the founding fathers based their definition of ‘we, the people.’

Many great minds have rejected the gobbledy-gook of a paradise on earth.

The differences between us are hardly superficial no matter what utopian garbage Obama and his minions feed the masses.

Secular humanists who decry religion and traditional morality have nothing in common with us. The First Amendment may guarantee their right to speak and preach but to suggest we stand on common ground is absurd.

Islamist terrorists who have crossed our borders, blown up our buildings and killed Americans have nothing in common with us. In fact, the left’s insistence on commonality, all-inclusiveness (Alisnky preached this) and political correctness have not united us but rendered us sitting ducks for our enemies.